User:CeridwynQ/Girl, Interrupted (film)/Elyonn Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * CeridwynQ


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Girl, Interrupted (film)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Girl, Interrupted (film)
 * Girl, Interrupted (film)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - yes a new lead has been added to reflect the content that is within the article. It’s clear, concise and well written. It describes the articles in the major sections and provides links for everything

Content

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? - yes most of the content is relevant to the topic. It goes very in-depth about critically acclaimed accolades and the likes. It is also up to date and written very well

Tone and Balance

• Is the content added neutral? - the content added is neutral in tone and does not attempt to gear the reader towards any direction but rather informs them as well as provides information that is useful and relevant to the article.

Sources and References

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - the content is backed up by reliable sources. The links work and they are referred to appropriately and as Wikipedia guidelines suggest. A lot research has been done to back up every other statement, claim or fact in this article.

Organization

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - the content is well written and easy to read. It is grammatically correct and broken down into well categorized sections and subheadings. Each section is well explained and provides useful information to the enhancement of the article.

Images and Media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - A lot of images have been used that have aided in the understanding of the topic as well as visual aids such as colored tables and charts. All of these elements have elevated the aesthetics of the article and enables easy flow for the reader.

Overall impressions

I believe the content has definitely improved the overall quality of this article as it goes in depth and  has gone through obvious rigorous research and analysis as well as good editing. Every information was backed up with reliable sources. I definitely enjoyed reading it.