User:Cfhan11/Victor Morax/Caitlinmball Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cfhan11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cfhan11/Victor Morax


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Victor Morax

Lead
I think the lead information that you have in your sandbox is a great addition to the article. When editing the article, I would suggest making the lead section more concise with less paragraphs. As of right now, it looks like it is a little choppy.

Content
Some of the sections are lacking a little with content, so the addition of information will be beneficial. I would try to find some more information for the "Early Life" section because it seems like there is a brief entry about his childhood home, the fact that his dad was a physician, and that he had two brothers. Is there any information about a hobby or home life prior to obtaining his degree? I think all information present is up to date and are relevant contributions.

Tone and Balance
All the information is neutral. I did not recognize any bias or persuasion.

Sources and References
I see that a lot of information was cited, so really great job! However, should there be a citation for the information in the "Early Life" section? I checked the citations and all of them "work".

Organization
I like that you took a few sections from the article and played around with the addition of new information. I was able to easily distinguish what section(s) were being talked about. I think the sections were concise and easy to read. I did not notice any grammatical errors.

Images and Media
My peer has not included any images/media in his/her sandbox.

Good job! Keep adding information if you can find more sources.