User:Cfhan11/Victor Morax/Emilylavia Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cfhan11


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cfhan11/Victor Morax


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Victor Morax

Lead
The Lead overall looks good, but can be expanded on. When was he born? What specific work did he do?

Content
The content added by my peer is relevant to the topic and up-to-date. It does not appear that there is any content missing, but some sections could be expanded on such as his early life - where did he receive an education? What was his family like? It does not seem that this article deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral and unbiased. There does not appear to be any persuasion being done, just strictly information about the person of interest.

Sources and References
The sources provided are reliable secondary sources of information. The added content reflects what the sources say. After viewing the sources myself (the links do work), they seem to be current and thorough and a good place to find information about the person of interest. The sources appear to only be written by one author each, so I would try to find at least one or two more sources that can help add diversity to the content. I would check the OU library database to find more reliable articles/books.

Organization
The content added is concise and straightforward. There are no grammatical or spelling errors that I can see. There is not enough content added to have paragraphs, so I would add more content to add to the organization of the article.

Images and Media
There are no added images or media.

Overall Impressions
The article has the potential to be a great source of information! It is very interesting and straightforward - just keep researching and finding more about the person of interest.