User:Cgeneb09/CAMK/GreyCanary21 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cgeneb09


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cgeneb09/CAMK?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * CAMK

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I'm currently not seeing any content in any of the sandboxes (bibliography, Sandbox draft, etc) (12/7), so perhaps making sure to publish changes can help.

With that in mind:

I see a lot of good sources in your sandbox (12/9), which is great!

Any new content should also be alluded to in the first paragraph of the CAMK article.

I'd be curious to know if there are any general subsections of the article that are missing that can be added, or if it is more specific to more minor current research.

I don't think you'll have any issues with tone/balance as this seems like a fairly uncontroversial topic.

One of the interesting guiding questions of the review focuses on fnding sources from historically underrepresented groups, so if you're able to find a source like that, that'd be great.

I'm happy to check grammar at a later time. I'll check back on the 9th in the afternoon.

For an image, you could potentially add an image showing a pie chart of the distribution of substrate-specific vs multi-functional CAMKinases. Additionally, an image showing the CAMKII subunits like the diagram of CAMKI would be useful.

12/11

I think I saw edits earlier this week in the sandbox draft, but I'm not seeing them now (so it might be good to check if it's publishing properly)

I just came to add that I was looking at the article and thought that it might also be a good idea to specify whether CAMK I is a substrate-specific or multi-functional kinase. Additionally, adding a small portion on CAMK III in the Structure section would be helpful. I also would love to see a ballpark estimate on how many CAMK kinases have been discovered so far (other than the 3 mentioned). Are there 4? Hundreds? If there are significantly more than those listed, what makes CAMK 1 and CAMK 2 so important? If there are only a few, why not add info on the others?

Otherwise, keep up the good work!