User:CgmDUKE/sandbox

Linguistic Anthropology

 * Intro is succinct, well-written, and balanced.
 * Covers three main paradigms of linguistic anthropology.
 * Citations seem sparse in some areas but most information is appropriately cited.
 * Article is contemporary and up-to-date.

Phonology

 * Intro is good but could contain more citations.
 * Everything is relevant to phonology.
 * No apparent bias.
 * Quality level is rated a C for a "substantial" article that is "still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material." Talk page contains a lot of competing viewpoints on how to improve the article.

Morphology

 * Much more comprehensive than the above two articles.
 * However, has far fewer citations.
 * Article is neutral, citations are properly linked.
 * Also rated at a C level.