User:Cgochuico3/Transphobia/Jackiebedolla Peer Review

General info
Cgochuico3
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Cgochuico3/Transphobia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Transphobia

Evaluate the drafted changes
LEAD:

The lead does reflect the new content that will be added to the article. It is a concise lead and includes an idea of what the article is about. Including more information on the mental and physical health of people of color, since in the article, it was mentioned, but there was no detail on the subject. Although it was more information, the lead was just missing a brief description of the major sections of the article, but I do feel that those major sections were mentioned in the article body.

ARTICLE BODY:

The overall tone of the article body was neutral and informative. The new information that will be added is up-to-date information from a 2022 study and also a 2017 which is within ten years. It is very much related to the topic, adding more information to a topic that was briefly mentioned in the article. people of color were underrepresented since it was a main focus overall. It is very detailed and has data/ studies that support the information being added. No information that was mentioned was biased or geared to a certain side; there was no persuasion.

REFERENCES:

References are how they are supposed to be on Wikipedia pages.