User:Cgpoppert/Digital media in education/Pikelake6 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cgpoppert


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Cgpoppert/Digital media in education - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Guiding questions:

LEAD: The article starts out with a good definition that has a citation that is accurate. Please note that the word ability is duplicated in the first sentence. And,software is plural.

The lead does not include identifying sections (I did not include in mine too!). I think that what you covered in the lead is accurate, concise and covers what is in the article.

CONTENT: The content is relevant and describes what is covered in digital media. In the section on How Digital Media is Used, I would break this into paragraphs to highlight each media and make sure it is organized by each example. Also, it looks like some citations are missing (for example - Cook-Sather). I think that the section on Benefits is a good summary, but I think that you may have stronger statements if you include examples with citations. Also, I think that citation 4 does not really address the statement - but I just could not find it.

GENERAL EDITING: Make sure all of the fonts and font size are the same. Check grammar. And use appropriate paragraphs especially in the Benefits and Covid 19 sections to better organize the topic.

LINKS: I spot checked and they all seemed to work. I did notice that some references need to be corrected for APA Also, a couple of citation are older than 10 years - but they may be the best. I could not open a few resources and my question is if that is ok in Wikipedia because we could accesss the article through the U of Mn article.

TONE AND BALANCE: I felt that I understand the importance of digital media and I especially liked that you included a section on COVID 19. I would like to know more about the four types of learning and how each contribute to improving learning. But, overall - I think that you provide a balanced observation. The information on digital media and showcasing though seems out of place. Could you address more about opportunities to learn through digital media and then do a separate section on showing casing other work

QUESTION: Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? I was wondering if in the impact on education you could address individuals with different learning styles or underrepresented students and how digital media can support these students.