User:ChRoseP22/Faye Harrison/Dominiquemm98 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

username: ChRoseP22/ Faye Harrison

peer review by Dominique Montoya

The structure for the page is quite strong and nicely organized. I like how there is the original work in the introduction to see what changes y'all expanded to make the page stick out more. I also want to comment on how detailed everything is within the page and how the tone is neutral. However, I would like to see more details in the Educator section because it seems like it's unfinished, but the information so far is good! I like how y'all add the part of her major publication because that is valid and important for people to see how much this women accomplish. One thing I suggest is to maybe put together the major publication section with the awards and honors section because both seem to have the same mean in my eyes, but still I like the formate of the page. Overall, I actually learned a lot from reading y'alls page so far, so keep up the good work!


 * Link to draft you're reviewinghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ChRoseP22/Faye_Harrisoveaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ChRoseP22/Faye_Harrisonveaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)