User:Chairomai/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Neodermaptera

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I feel that many insects are overlooked since there is so much diversity involved with them. My preliminary impression of this article was that it is very short and lacking information compared to a lot of other Wikipedia articles.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

In terms of the content, the article seems to be very short compared to other articles, though the information present appears to be accurate and cited appropriately. That being said, I question how appropriate using BioLib as a source is. Perhaps some information introducing BioLib's credibility would help, for example, mentioning that it is an online encyclopedia. The tone appears to be neutral, and no viewpoints or opinions seem to be expressed. In terms of sources, there are very few - only six total. Two of the sources share one of the same authors. One source does not have a link. There is not a diversity of sources. For the article's talk page, there is no discussion present. Some images are present, which reflect the subject. Overall, the main issue with the article appears to be that it is very short, lacking much information, as the topic likely is not well studied. There are very few sources and few sections, two of the six sources having one of the same authors as well.