User:Chall562/Wildlife conservation/Janantayudha Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chall562


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Draft


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Wildlife Conservation

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The vaccine administration in the draft is a solid way of adding new information to the article making it more developed. The draft looks neutral, backed up by multiple reliable sources that are up to date with the latest source from 2016. The draft could be provided with an Ethiopian wolf image for the readers. The information is well-informed, easy to read, and adds new updated information. The vaccine administration was missing in the conservation methods from the wildlife conservation article.