User:Chandler2110/sandbox

Article Evaluation 1. Everything in the article is pretty relavent and there’s nothing really that distracts me on the article. 2. I think the article leans more towards the side of school starting later because there isn’t much facts on why school starts earlier. 3. There are viewpoints that are heavily overrepresented and that’s the side of starting school later. 4. The sources work fine and are support the clam of the article. 5. The facts are represented with the right sources that work. 6. The facts in this article are still relevant in today’s time, but I wish there was a little bit more information on the history. 7. There isn’t much in the talk page but there is people just suggesting things to add to the article. 8. This article isn’t rated. 9. The way this article is explained throughout is the same way I explained my article throughout the year. 10. Reddy, Sumathi. "Your Health: More Schools Consider Later Start Times for Teenagers." Wall Street Journal, 26 Aug 2014, p.D.1

This citation can be used for real life examples of the issues.