User:Chandlerworks23/Aurelia limbata/SDEVER00 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chandlerworks23


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chandlerworks23/Aurelia_limbata?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Your lead is effective in summarizing your species, giving a clear description, and is a good length. The only thing I would suggest is changing the heading title to your species name instead of 'Lead'.

Content: Your content seem relevant, clearly written, and up to date, although, I feel additional information should be added, as well as additional sections about the species (which I'm sure you were already going to add).

Tone and Balance: Article has a neutral tone.

Sources and References: So far the sources and references seem good and my only comment is to make sure you include at least 8 peer reviewed journals and at least 12 sources all together.

Organization: Your organization is good so far, I would just add more sections and information.

Images and Media: The image you have really adds to the article and is laid out in a visually appearing way.

Overall: You have a strong lead and cover the content about your species well. You appear to be on the right track and my only interjection is to include more information in more sections and ensure you include at least 8 peer reviewed journals and at least 12 sources all together. All of which I assume you were already going todo.