User:Chaosdruid/GA1


 * GA review details - Checklist and current review

List
= pass : = needs further checking/work :  = oops! fail


 * 1) Initial pass fail criteria - Reviewing_good_articles
 * 2) Checklinks (bear in mind this is not as accurate as it could be, check any dodgy seeming ones.)
 * MoS
 * 1) Layout
 * 2) Scripts to run (Dashes & hyphens etc.)
 * 3) Consistency of style (e.g. dd-mm-yyyy x4; mm-dd-yyyy x1)
 * 4) CopyVio/Plagiarism - copy a few sections of text and run through Google
 * 5) Prose & refs
 * 6) Lead: too long/short, items not in body, etc.
 * 7) Body: (of text)
 * 8) Refs
 * 9) Reliability (blogs etc)
 * 10) Dead?
 * 11) Accurate? - they say what the article says
 * 12) Broad coverage
 * 13) Major aspects
 * 14) Coverage
 * 15) Neutral?
 * 16) Stable?
 * 17) Images
 * 18) Too many/few, placement, relevance
 * 19) alt= present? free use? fair-use rationale?

Template

 * aye, nay, wtf, and ???


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: