User:ChaoticMusical/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Disability

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article as part of an assignment for my disability rhetorics class. I'm also interested in teaching and learning from others about the topic of disability.

Evaluate the article
The lead provides a well-written introductory sentence. The lead doesn't include a description of the article's major sections or information that isn't present. The lead is concise.

The article's content is relevant to the topic. The content is up-to-date. There is no missing content or content that doesn't belong. The report does deal with one of the equity gaps and the article addresses a topic related to a historically underrepresented population and topic.

The article is neutral, it doesn't contain any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. There are no overrepresented or underrepresented, any minority and/or fringe viewpoints are described as such. The article doesn't attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another.

All facts mentioned in the article are backed up by reliable secondary sources of information. The sources referenced are current and written by a diverse spectrum of authors that include historically marginalized individuals wherever possible. There are better sources available such as peer-reviewed scholarly articles. All links that have been checked work.

The article is well-written. It is concise, clear, and easy to read. The article doesn't have any grammatical or spelling errors. The article is well-organized and broken down into multiple sections that reflect the topic's major points.

The article includes images that enhance understanding of the topic. The images are captioned well, adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations, and are laid out in a visually appealing way.

The other users on the article's talk page express wanting the article to reach FA status and an evaluation for B-class. A discussion took place to address the link redirection to a similar article. The article has been rated as a level-3 vital article in Society and as C-Class by the WikiProject Vital Articles. It's part of the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Accessibility, WikiProject Disability, WikiProject Human Rights, WikiProject Psychology, WikiProject Autism, WikiProject Medicine, and WikiProject Epilepsy. It differs in the way that the "Further Reading" section is discussed heavily along with overall changes that were made or should be made.

The article overall is at a really good stage of completion. The article discusses both the actual topic of disability and goes into examples of specific disabilities. The article discusses US and Canada-centric examples of disability policy when those should be in respective articles based on country. The "Further Reading" list needs fewer US-centric sources. The article is well-developed so far.