User:Charfriedman/Mihrab/JuliaOlszewsk19 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Charfriedman
 * User:Charfriedman/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * The lead includes information that summarizes the Mihrab fairly well.
 * Yes it does address the fact that Mihrabs will be the subject of the article, it does however include a judgment statement claiming that "Mihrab are the most important part of a mosque." I'm not completely sure if that should be the first sentence.
 * I think this person is going to cover various examples of Mihrabs in different Mosques but they don't really clarify that in the lead.
 * There is not much of the article written but they do address the features of a Mihrab.
 * The lead is concise.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * The content is pretty valuable because adding examples of Mihrabs would be important to show what they look like and apply visuals.
 * Yes it is up-to-date. because they used more recent sources.
 * They have not filled out all of the locations and it seems like they are planning on adding more.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The first sentence begins with a statement that Mihrabs are the most important part of a Mosque and I thought that was a little opinionated and non-biased. Other than that the rest of the article is pretty neutral.
 * The first sentence but it isn't malicious or anything it just is more opinionated than what should be on a Wikipedia page.
 * Not particularly no.
 * No it just emphasizes the importance of the Mihrab which is good.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All three of their sources back their information up.
 * They are, one is even a book that has a solid amount of information.
 * The book source is from 1996, another source is from 2008, and the other is a newly updated website that is timely and modern.
 * All three links work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Their statements are very concise and to the point.
 * There are minimal grammatical errors.
 * The introduction is a solid layout further followed by sections of each location. Those sections are not complete however.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * No it does not.
 * There are no images included in their sandbox.
 * No image in their sandbox.
 * No images yet to be laid out.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Yes it does match the notability requirements.
 * There aren't too many sources but they are various forms that can be analyzed. For example, one is a book, and two are unique styles of websites.
 * Not really. It has paragraphs and properly done sources but there are no unique info boxes and images. The title is formatted correctly
 * No it does not.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * I think the information they have presented has potential to impact the article in a positive way, it just needs to be beefed up more.
 * The really strong introduction that lays out what they are trying to say about Mihrabs very well.
 * Add photos, layout more sections (i.e., a title for the locations), and finish what they were going to say.