User:Charisse.v/9/11 conspiracy theories/Sbradford1149 Peer Review

Overall the Lead does reflect the content added by the peer and is presented in a clear way that describe's the general census. It includes elements such as in introductory sentence and brief descriptions in major sections. I believe that the Lead is concise, however it could be considered too broad. I think adding one more specific element in regards to 9/11 conspiracies could be slightly more helpful, but overall it portrays an adequate reflection of the information. I also would say that the tone is very neutral and does not display any bias. There are a lot of references that can be considered reliable sources and everything in-text was acknowledged. The images and videos are properly displayed and add significance to the topic. All of the images and videos are captioned and adhere to copyright guidelines. Grammatically, the article is very adequate and no errors were spotted. In conclusion, the added information provided quality to the article and does a good job at recognizing all perspectives of the topic discussed.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)