User:CharlieFarrell74/Misogyny in sports/Grace g23 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
1) The article's language is very clear and concise. There was a good amount of sources to backup their information, and the sources were citied properly.

2) One change I would suggest is adding more to the last paragraph of the article and explaing more about how the Title IX retaliation clause is a problem and not beneficial to victims. A small change I noticied is there is only one quotqation mark in a specific section. It should have another one signifiying the end of the quote or if it isn't needed, it should be deleted. It is in the fifth paragrapgh.

3) I think the most important thing the author could do is to change the article to include more recent examples. The most recent example is from 2018 which is about five years ago. I think to show that this is still an ongoing probelm in sports, recent examples would help.

4) In our article, one theme we are writing about is sexual misconduct, so some of the sources in this article would be beneifical for our article as well.