User:Charlie Sewall/Phaistos/Anonymouse678 Peer Review

General info
Charlie Sewall
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Charlie Sewall/Phaistos
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Phaistos

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reading the edits, I feel like this is a nice addition to what is already posted in the original article. The Lead is nicely condensed and is not too detailed. The content that was added feel like it was a nice addition with it also feeling neutral. One part that I appreciated, was that "Palace" was given its own section as there was a lot to talk about its beauty. In the original article having it only briefly in the "Bronze Age" topic made it feel out of place.

As for things that could be worked on, there are a bunch of needed citations all over the article but the creator addressed this and is working on it. I don't have any glaring problems with the edits as I believe that this was a nicely done edit. Something that I would change though, is that in the original article, in "Excavation" section, the lines, "After 1955 the place name, 𐀞𐀂𐀵, pa-i-to, interpreted as Phaistos (written in Mycenaean Greek), began to turn up in the Linear B tablets at Knossos." was moved to the "Bronze Age" section. This is more of a critique than something that is genuinely wrong, I feel like having this in the Bronze Age makes it feel out of place. Overall, I think that this was nice edit to the article as it lifted what was already said in the original. My only major issues is that some links either don't work or are missing but this issue was mentioned by the editor.