User:Charliehojjat/Pierre Paul Émile Roux

[First paragraph]

Additionally, he investigated cholera, chicken-cholera, rabies, and tuberculosis. Roux is regarded as a founder of the field of immunology.

[Early years, after first sentence]

It is believed that Roux had a fatherless childhood.

[Early years, after second to last sentence]

It is also believed that Roux may have been dismissed from the military for some form of insubordination.

[After first paragraph]

In 1878, Pierre Paul Emile Roux married Rose Anna Shedlock, but it was kept a secret. Shedlock and Roux met Roux at the Paris medical school. Shedlock then died in 1879 of tuberculosis. In an inaccurate biography, Roux's niece stated that Shedlock contracted tuberculosis from Roux. However, this is unlikely, given that Shedlock had symptoms before getting married to Roux. According to his niece, Roux allegedly believed that marriage was an opportunity for women to satisfy their "deepest aspirations," while for men it was "mutilation ."

[Diphtheria research paragraph ]

[After first sentence]

Diphtheria is contagious microbial disease marked by throat lesions, polyneuritis, myocarditis, low blood pressure, and collapse.

[Before first sentence]

The development of a diphtheria anti-toxin serum was a race between researchers Emil Behring in Berlin, and Emile Roux in Paris. They both developed it nearly simultaneously. However, the serum was marketed differently in each country. In Germany, the serum was marketed in a private business setting, whereas in France, the serum was distributed through a communal health care system. The race to develop the diptheria anti-toxin serum was considered a national rivalry, although each team of researchers adopted each other's experimental practices and built off of each other. In a controversy, the first noble prize for Physiology and Medicine was given to Emil Von Behring for his work on the serum therapy for diphtheria. Roux had been nominated in 1888 for the isolation of the diphtheria toxin, but didn't win the prize in 1901 because his discovery was deemed to be too "old." Over the years, Roux came close to the Noble Prize but never won.

[Work with Pasteur, right after first sentence]

When Roux first began his career with Pasteur, he started as an animal inoculator. He performed well in the technical tasks, and became more involved with research. [Work with Pasteur, right after first paragraph]

Louis Pasteur and Emile Roux were sometimes in disagreement in their approach to disease. Pasteur was an experimental scientist, whereas Roux was more focused on clinical medicine. They also held different religious and political beliefs, with Pasteur being a right- leaning Catholic, and Roux being a left-leaning atheist. Given their many differences, they clashed often as they worked towards vaccines against anthrax and rabies. The main issues between Roux and Pasteur regarded the ethics of human experimentation, specifically, the amount evidence from animal experimentation on the rabies vaccine needed in order to justify giving the vaccine to humans. Roux was more reluctant to give the vaccine to humans without further evidence that it was safe in animals.

[Work with Pasteur, 2nd paragraph after first sentence]

Roux discovered the idea of intracranial transmission of rabies, which paved the road for many more Pastorian milestones in research

[Work with Pasteur, 3rd paragraph after second sentence]

Roux is known for developing the concept of combining development, research, and application in a specialized hospital.

[after first sentence]

The most distinctive feature of the Pasteur Hospital was free access to medical care. The hospital was also known for being very hygienic for the time period.

[Awards and Honors, right after copley medal]

for his outstanding achievements in research.

I do think that you provide excellent references but I think you should provide more background. Include his monumental relationships that he has created and how that has impacted him. Give me more background and an insight into his career and how that has played into the medical world. He played a huge role in research, how did that go? What awards and accomplishments has he achieved? Include these aspects into your article and I think you should be good to go. Also, summarize it clearly and make distinct paragraphs emphasizing the topic at hand. I think that you need to state an article topic that grabs the reader's attention on who they are in a single sentence. You do an excellent job of summarization of the major points.You do need to provide a little bit more information regarding each paragraph you speak of, which you are in the process of. You clearly have appropriate grammar and headings. I assume that you will be covering info in great detail within the upcoming week. Your citations are great but I do think that you still need to fill in those content gaps.