User:Charlottesweb03/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.) Oliphant

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.) I chose this article because there wasn't enough coverage on it. I also chose it because I didn't know much about the topic to begin with. I love elephants and was also concerned for the fact that their husks are being taken from them and used for other purposes. My impression was that the tusks were only used for hunting but they actually had a lot of different purposes that the page left out.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article now, consists of a bunch of links without information. There is no coverage on the people, geography, art, entertainment, and media, others. I feel like we could maybe go without or leave certain section alone and just help provide information on the oliphant. There is no place of origin noted on the page as well as people are lacking. It just looks as though these links were pasted without any intention. As a group, we need to provide the basic information so that readers can truly understand what the oliphant is.