User:Charlyhernandez214/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Sustainability studies
 * It is closely related to my field of study and there was rarely any other articles related to landscape architecture.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * The Lead does not have an opening sentence that best describes the subject of the article.
 * The Lead does not include a brief description on the major sections.
 * There is information in the opening paragraph that is not further discussed throughout the article.
 * The article is fairly concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * The content is relevant to the topic.


 * It is not up to date.
 * There is a lot of content missing.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * In parts the article is neutral.
 * There are claims that are directed to only one aspect of the subject.
 * There are viewpoints that are underrepresented, further information can be added.
 * The article informs the reader about sustainability but doesn't try to persuade readers.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * All the facts in the article seemed to be backed up by a reliable source.


 * The sources are not thorough, more research could have been done.
 * The sources are a bit dated but not too much where they wouldn't be acknowledged.
 * The links seem to all work.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * The article is easy to read.


 * A few grammatical errors can be found in the article.
 * The article is well-organized, more sections should have been added.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * There are no images that enhance the understanding of the topic.


 * The image shown is well-captioned.
 * All images adhere to the regulations.
 * Images are visually appealing.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * There's no conversations on the talk page.


 * The article is rated as a stub-class. It is part of the WikiProject Environment.

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * The article seems to be finished
 * The article doesn't contain any strengths.
 * Further research and more articles related to the subject can fully improve this article.
 * The article is poorly-developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: