User:Chasekrieger/sandbox

Article evaluation 1. Yes, everything in the article is revalent to the issue and no the article presented the information so that it is easy to understand. 2. No, the article is biased toward the viewpoint that illegal immigration don't pose a negative effect on the United States economy or security. 3. Yes, the viewpoint that illegal immigration poses a negative effect on the United States economy and security is underrepresented. They don't include facts that justifies that claim. 4. Yes, the links for the citations work and support the claims presented in the article. 5. Yes, the facts are referenced in an appropriate and reliable way. The information does come from reliable sources, however the majority are biased to the viewpoint that illegal immigration doesn't pose a negative effect on the U.S. And no the bias is not noted. 6. No, the information is relevantly up to date. And there should be facts that justify the viewpoint that believes that illegal immigration poses a negative effect of the U.S. 7. The conversations on the talk page are mostly people talking about the facts that and information that is presented in the article. 8. The article is rated pretty good and it is not a part of any Wikipedia projects. 9. Wikipedia present a vast amount of information that goes into your article, while we only talked about a same part of the information into the article in class.