User:Chassgraves/Three-toed sloth/Presleygilbert Peer Review

Lead

The lead is somewhat vague and has the potential to be much more concise and clear regarding the specific focus of the added information.

There is no mention of major sections of the article.

The lead is not overly detailed but could be more specific but concise.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic. I cannot tell if the content is up to date because I cant see a reference list or the dates of the research findings that were used to construct the paragraph's content. Everything in the paragraph belongs, but the content is missing more depth and actual mentions of specific research findings to support the topic and ideas being dicussed. It would make the paragraph more informative to add statistical information.

Sources and References

There are no sources cited that I am aware of or can see. It is missing both in text citations and a reference list or links to references.

Overall Impression

The added material is off to a good start and is easy to read and understand. However, there is some information as well as sources lacking and needs some touch ups before being published.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)