User:ChayaRenee/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Oyster Reef Restoration
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article is relevent to the topic and written in a neutral tone.
 * Every claim is cited.
 * Not all claims are cited with scientifically peer-reviewed sources. News articles (The Monthly, NYT) and government websites are also used
 * The article is interesting because it includes specific examples by country and regions within the countries
 * There are a long list of scientifically peer-reviewed articles regarding oyster reef restoration.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Apalachicola Bay
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article needs work!
 * The article consists of only 1 source (NOAA). Is NOAA permitted?
 * The article consists primarily of external links to other wikipedia pages and 3 government websites
 * There is little detail regarding wildlife/aquatic life in the Apalachicola Bay
 * There is no information on surrounding issues (Degredation of Oyster Reefs, ACF "Water Wars", Climate Change)
 * There are several peer reviews scientific articles that cover a variety of ecological and socio-ecological issues surrounding the Apalachicola Bay
 * Sources
 * There are several peer reviews scientific articles that cover a variety of ecological and socio-ecological issues surrounding the Apalachicola Bay
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Disease Ecology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Mid/Stub Quality
 * The content of the article is relevant to the topic
 * The article provides a general definition of Disease Ecology and its general implications
 * There is little detail regarding key concepts of Disease Ecology
 * It does not mention the SEIR Model, used analyze and make predictions in disease outbreaks
 * All of the sources are peer-reviewed. Each claim has a citation.
 * It is written neutrally. The section on climate change may lean toward making an argument. Is this okay if the peer reviewed articled cited makes this argument? There are suffienct of studies on how disease spread is projected to worsen with climate change.
 * Sources
 * It is written neutrally. The section on climate change may lean toward making an argument. Is this okay if the peer reviewed articled cited makes this argument? There are suffienct of studies on how disease spread is projected to worsen with climate change.
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Na'Taki Osborne Jelks
 * Article Evaluation
 * All of the information in this article is relevant to the individual.
 * Besides bibliographical information, it briefly shares the focus on Dr. Jelks' work, however it lacks specific examples.
 * Not all sources are peer-reviewed articles. The editors used People.com, NYT, elpnet.org
 * Are non peer-reviewed sources permitted to retrieve interviews or information from the organization with which the person was involved?
 * This article tackles a Wickipedia Equity Gap (Women of Color in Science/Environmental Science)
 * The article is written neutrally, but there are a few claims that do not include an attached citation.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources