User:Cheche1993/sandbox

 Article Evaluation 

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. There isnt anything that was distracting.

None of the information is out of date. There is nothing that is missing that I can find.

I cant see anything that could be improved.

The article maintains a neutral position. There are no claims that are biased. I noticed that the article added the biblical context behind the idea that Jesus is the Good Shepherd They compare and contrast if the good Shepherd is a parable or a metaphor, which shows both sides of the argument without trying to persuade the reader.

The links work to the citations. The sources definitely support the claims in the article.

Each fact is referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference. The information comes from various academic books that deal with Christian iconography and biblical themes. All the sources are neutral.

The conversations going on behind the scenes are the fact that some Wikipedians feel that there sound be no section regarding the Good Shepherd being a parable. They also disagree with the wording in the article that the showing Jesus as the Good Shepherd was “stolen” from the Greeks.

We haven’t covered this artwork in this class but I have studied in my Art 1A class.

Click on Good Shepherd to head over to Wikipedia page!