User:Ched/Arbcom

My page to deal with all things Arbcom:

IMO thoughts
very rough draft here, but some passing thoughts.
 * There should be a minimum effort at DR prior to filing a case (outside emergency actions). Be it 3 or 4 or whatever number should be decided upon, there should be some community review at some DR board. (AN, AN/I, etc.)
 * I think that once a case has been accepted, then anyone wishing to offer evidence should be added to the case, and their own actions should be open to review
 * Arbs and former arbs should not be contributing evidence unless the case involves them directly, and they should be added to the case party list if they do
 * Absolutely NO arb (past or present) should be stating "I think editorx should be sanctioned" outside the active arbs in the PD vote.
 * I think some sort of appeal process should be instituted. Especially when new evidence/facts/circumstances come to light post PD.
 * NO arb should incite, encourage, or even hint at another editor filing a case; either on-wiki, or especially off-wiki. If an Arb feels a case should be filed, then they should have the integrity to file it themselves and stand as a party to the case.  Anything less is unbecoming.

Rough drafts

 * to review for formatting, content, and flow of posts.

WP:ARBREX references

 * AC/N
 * AC talk
 * AC talk
 * VP

WP:AP3

 * Prep for WP:AP3
 * ANI: JzG Incivility
 * WP/AE: WP:AE JzG
 * ANI: Snark and Bite
 * RfD LABLEAKLIKELY
 * Lab Leak MfD
 * WP:RS CNN
 * CNN again
 * Israel
 * Lab Leak at RSN see following sections as well.
 * JzG talk See continuing bickering w/Beyond my Ken and Specifico at end.
 * ANI - BMK Note culling and eliminating (2)

Sigs

 * AN/I
 * wp:sig - multiple threads
 * VP