User:CheechCol/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article Title: Blanqueamiento
 * Article Evaluation: C-Class
 * The article provides some basic background information on a topic, specifically, defining and connecting how "Blanqueamiento" or racial whitening, was implemented in Latin America. The author has been on wikipedia for 16 years. They have been an admin for 14 years. The audience is the general public. Most of the information comes from credible sources. It has a small edit history and the diversity of comments is low.
 * Sources
 * The article provides some basic background information on a topic, specifically, defining and connecting how "Blanqueamiento" or racial whitening, was implemented in Latin America. The author has been on wikipedia for 16 years. They have been an admin for 14 years. The audience is the general public. Most of the information comes from credible sources. It has a small edit history and the diversity of comments is low.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article Title: Latin America–United States relations
 * Article Evaluation:
 * C-Class
 * The article provides extensive background information on a topic. However, Brazil makes up a significant part of south america and is not discussed in detail. There are multiple different sources contributing to the page. The audience is the general public. Most of the information comes from credible sources. It has a large edit history and the diversity of comments is high.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title: Post-neoliberalism
 * Article Evaluation: Start
 * The article provides a brief background on a topic. It fails to go into a deep dive of the past, present or future. There are a lot of sources for the amount of information provided. The goal of this page is to get the conversation started on this topic. The audience is the general public. Most of the information comes from credible sources. It has a very small edit history and almost no diversity in the comments. It is an incomplete article so it definitely could be useful to work on.
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources