User:Cheesecassidea/Louise Blanchard Bethune/Grichmon Peer Review

Lead

- Lead has been updated with a good amount of new, relevant content.

- Pretty concise, there was a sentence I had to re-read, but still nicely done.

- Lead well organized

Content

- all relevant and up to date. Historically accurate.

Tone and Balance

- I didn't sense any bias, very neutral

- viewpoint well balanced

Sources

- most sources used are scholarly, all reliable

Organization

- good use of header, easy to read

Media

- not sure if she added pictures

Overall impression

- nicely done, good effort involved

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)