User:Cheezits224

Add information This is the page of a college student in a class taught by Steven Arnston.

About Me
Hi so my name is Cheezits224 and im currently a college student at Evcc and working two jobs. Im striving to get my associates for early education and hoping to transfer to Washing State University in Bothell to earn my degree there. I am a twin, just a little basic fact i would like to state.

My Pet Parrot
My Wikipedia interest would probably be information about my pet parrot. So its a Orange Winged Amazon and he’s currently 13 years old. And they do live up to 60 plus years [1] He’s literally my baby, and its basically taking care of a child. I’ve had him about 6 years and he’s still a little baby.

Article Evaluation
So I checked out Ford page on Wikipedia, and found three aspects of it worth commenting on: lack of citations, lack of modern information, and lack of global emphasis.

Lack of citations
So when I was reading the Ford page on Wikipedia, I noticed phrases that needed citations literally says “citation needed”. I knew from just that, the information that was put in the article did not have that background information. It should’ve had some sort of real information based on what’s said because Ford is such a huge company known by many.

Lack of Modern Information
Something I also noticed is how old the article is. I checked the date on when the article was last checked in January this year. So pretty much now. But when I was reading it and seeing all the pictures to represent Ford and give the article some more information through the photos. But all I saw was old photos and not what I normally see in todays Ford ads, websites, and even in dealership promotions. I was just looking for new and modern information when reading the Ford page Wikipedia article.

Lack of global emphasis
Another thing I was looking for in this big Ford page on Wikipedia article is their huge company outside the country, like overseas. There was a slight comment on their European cars. But I guess I needed more because how unique and multiple models they have just for European cars. Like those cars still belong to the Ford company, the article should at least have a paragraph about their overseas cars.

Conclusion
Even though the Ford page in Wikipedia had a lot of information and the background of how Ford first started. But most of the article was missing citations and other references that can really support the information written in the Wikipedia page. And most of the article needed information about modern updates of the ford company, like their new products that they just released or about to in a couple of years. What next steps the company could take especially how big the company truly is, especially in other countries. The article needed more information about Ford’s European cars and how unique their designs are. But again I overall loved reading about the history of the Ford company.