User:Chelsei.L/Oyster reef restoration/Anaeradze Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chelsei.L, Eco144, KMorales34


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Oyster reef restoration
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

Yes, the lead has been updated.

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

Article includes an intoductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic.

• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

Yes, introduction includes brief description of the articles major sections.

• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?

No, the lead includes the information that is present in the article.

• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead is not overly detailed, giving accurate information about what will be in the article.

Content

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Article was edited at october 11, 2022 by Chealsea

she added citation 13, but I can not open the citation

second edit was made by eco144 he/she added Germany's oyster reef restoration projects.

The content added was relevant to the topic because it was given in the section where shows "examples by country"

• Is the content added up-to-date?

Article is from 2019 which is 3 years old, lot could happen in 3 years they should added another source that is at least 1 year old.

• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

I would include more countries, since its around the wold, i would include major countries that are depended on oyesters.

• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Oyester population has declined drastically some parts of the world its not allowed to even harvest oyesters.

Yes, it is dealing with historically underpresented topic

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?

yes, it is neutral.

• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No, there were no claims that appear heavily boased towatf particula position.

• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No.

• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

I love oysters, I did not know that they help enviroment tremendiously. I did not have much side on the matter if we shoud harvest oyesters or not but not that I have read the artcle I definetly agains harvesting oyesters until the reefs are restored and population has grown significantly.

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

yes, it has.

• Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)

it does, but I think the information is too short and not detailed. I would add couple of more paragraphs.

• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

yes.

• Are the sources current?

Source is from 2019 so its kind of out of date, i would use something closer to 2022

• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

Multiple individual writes source that was provided.

• Are better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)

yes, I found one article that is up to date

= Recent change in spatial distribution of the European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) inferred from field data and empirical models of living oysters and empty shells = This artcle was written in 2022. It is more upto date.

• Check a few links. Do they work?

link 4-- can not be accessed

link 13--can not be accessed

link 35--cam not be accessed

Organization

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

yes, contet is clear and easy to read

• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

No.

• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

it is well organized, but too short. I would include little bit more information.

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Only one image is included. I would add more images.

• Are images well-captioned?

Yes, but I would add more images becuase the artcle has only one.

• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

Yes.

• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

No, only one image and its not vwry appealing.

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

Article is more complete but still needs lot of work for example: needs more content.

• What are the strengths of the content added?

strength: "Previously, oyster reef restoration sites were located in shallow coastal waters."--- Comparison.

to what it is today.

• How can the content added be improved?

-More information needed.

-Pictures

-Graphs

-references should be checked and take out the ones that are not working.