User:Chelsei.L/Oyster reef restoration/Ash the dragonfly Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chelsei.L


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chelsei.L/Oyster_reef_restoration?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Oyster reef restoration

Evaluate the drafted changes
LEAD


 * The addition of new information was perfect, very concise, and to the point as to why the oyster populations are substrate limited. The addition of that new paragraph will make the initial paragraph flow smoothly. Great job!

CONTENT


 * At first, I was intimated by the amount of information, but I realize that you included the article and it was a great idea! I get to see if the addition of new information flow into the article. One correction, mussels not muscles (Ecosystem).
 * The contents are up to date, and it included the places where major coral reefs are found. I haven't read about the Caribbean. I think that would be a great addition to the article.

TONE & BALANCE


 * The tone was neutral and the view points were equally represented.

SOURCES AND REFERENCE


 * The sources were up to date and the content reflects what the sources say. The sources worked and the authors were diverse.

OVERALL IMPRESSION

The article was good. The addition of new information flows nicely but grammar and punctuation needs a little attention. Images would be a great addition to your article. I can't wait to see the final draft.

GREAT JOB!