User:Chem0111/St. Elmo's fire/AcademicWeapon05 Peer Review

General info
Chem0111
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Chem0111/St. Elmo's fire
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):St. Elmo's fire

Lead-
The first sentence of the lead does describe what the article is talking about and Chem011 has not yet updated the lead to also match the information added by them. I could not find any information in the lead that was not in the article and the lead is a little under developed by the original author based off what is throughout the article. The lead section does briefly touch up on the added content, but I think it should be updated to match the added content better.

Content-
The content supports and furthers the information that was already within the article. From what I can tell the original content is up to date but the article does have a couple of very outdated sources. Reading the article and the added content, it is clear the the information does fit nicely This article does not relate to one of wikipedias equity gasps, nor does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance-
The content added does not sway toward one side or another, it simply gives the reader information. No viewpoints within the article are under or overrepresented.

Sources and References-
This article has plenty of sources to choose from, when skimming through and looking at the sources, they perceive to be reliable and up to date for the most part. The links do in fact work. From what I can see most of the articles were written by several diverse spectrums of authors. The added content does not seem to have any sources added, unless I was not able to see them.

Organization-
I think the added content was well organized and created a clear path of following for the reader to go through.

Images and Media-
The original article has two images one is of the ship and the other is of electrostatic discharge. These images could be placed better, but I honestly don't think it matters. The do positively impact the article because it gives the reader a visual representative on some of the things the article relies on.

Overall Impressions-
I mean it's not a bad article, it is just busy with the original sources. I would just add tidbits throughout the text and see if you can find and more relevant sources to add.