User:Chem0111/St. Elmo's fire/Editsfordummies Peer Review

Lead:

It is constructed well enough to let the reader get the point across on the overall topic. The most you can do to make the lead more thorough is to make sure each sentence doesn't sound bland. TONE needs to be conveyed throughout.

Content:

Spaced out and divided up amongst the article to fill the topic be sure to have enough sources and information to guide the reader to understand the idea.

Sources and References: '

Along with the reference section of the article, it seemed a little confusing with most of the references not being actual citations but just definitions of words or phrases. Try to make the reference and "key term" section opposite of each other so the reader doesn't get the sources mixed up trying to find.

Organization:

Near the end of the article, the only part that confused me and I would respectfully fix would have to be how the paragraphs/information is set up. All of the spacing and no indents make the information look more like a list/informal.

Images and Media:

Look around and try to include some images and/or media to back up sources or topics to hook the reader into your topic.

Overall Impression:

Information 10/10

Make sure to include some tone to interest readers, you don't want the reader to get bored of the topic.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)