User:Chemistry22/Ferrichrome/Mkcm131 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Chemistry22
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Chemistry22/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? The lead does briefly discusses mechanism
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Just a concise detailed paragraph.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The information of the lead is present and useful for the rest of the paragraph.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise and contains the right amount of detail.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? References are 2003-2010 so yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? more can be added, only one paragraph

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Content is neutral
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Nothing appears to be biased
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Doesn't appear so
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, very neutral

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? All content has references
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, seems very through
 * Are the sources current? relatively current (2003-2012)
 * Check a few links. Do they work? There does not appear to be any link included

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Very concise,
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? None that was noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Easier to understand if it is broken down to specific points.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Good paragraph addition
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Very concise, very informative. Clearly knows alot about the subject.
 * How can the content added be improved? In the next addition, a good picture and info boxes would improve this article greatly.

Overall evaluation
This article has some good qualities. Very concise about certain aspects of the mechanism. More information is needed on the mechanism and overall process. TOverall, good job.