User:ChenooEE/User:Barrettke02/Raven Halfmoon/ChenooEE Peer Review

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Since updated by the professor checked over them, it seems this article has made slight adjustments, but some should be fixed like the citations.
 * The leading stater for the rest of the paper has specified who the artist is and the idea of what type of art he does for a beginning statement.
 * The lead has made a brief description of the type of art, that Tom Jones has done.
 * The lead has provided the information that is present throughout the
 * The lead is concise and provides, the type of artwork he's done being an author and also currently a professor as well.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * For the content from the biography to the artworks each of them has relevant information that talks about the artist.
 * So far the content for all the information about the artwork and artist seems to be up to date.
 * While most of it seems caught up, the artwork doesn't seem to have the current whereabouts of where the art is located.
 * The article should have information about the artwork addressing the historical representation of the meaning behind the artwork, and maybe talk about the cultural underrepresentation within the work that the artist is trying to show in their work.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * The article seems to be neutral based as it's more informative about the artist and their work.
 * The article doesn't hold bias and tends to be more informative.
 * It seems underrepresented to talk about the work of the artwork without understanding the background behind the culture.
 * The content seems to hold the viewer to understand the information about the artist and their artworks.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * The new sources given in the article, seem to be pretty reliable, though it's pretty hard to access some of them since they don't have URL shortcuts
 * So far the websites do accurately do have a similar definition on the description of what the artwork was made for such as Choka watching Oprah.
 * Some of the resources are okay with the information though there doesn't seem to be much information about the interpretation behind Tom Jone's artworks.
 * The sources are current for the last couple of years these articles have been written about the awards that Tom Jones won for his work.
 * It seems that most of the authors that are referenced from the sources such as Jim Dittmann, do have a particular field of writing about artist who do photography, but some like Maggie Duffy don't have a particular ground to writing authors just write different types of articles.
 * I do think a few links that may be helpful articles are A Warrior Celebration: The Photographs of Tom Jones and Tom Jones Zeroes in on Ho-Chunk Visibility which provide valuable information about the tribe that Tom Jones tries to put in his photography.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * The content seems to be in order of what we read.
 * The content has some commas that don't need to be added but so far it presents well, such as the second sentence in Elizah Leonard.
 * I would say the content has broken down the talk points of what the artist shows within their artwork but don't explain the historical significance of what the artwork is meant to represent

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * So far I think that the article, does have the sources it needs to talk about the subject, though if there are any more that you can find for your artist maybe useful.
 * So far each of the links have been useful information about Tom Jones, about some of his works, some talking about separate meanings for the artworks, and some accomplishments about the artist.
 * So far the article looks like its kept in a template of simple headings for the article that hold certain information.
 * Some of the links within his references do have another linked references like First Major Retrospective for Award-Winning Ho-Chunk Photographer Tom Jones, but it seems other's don't have other sources they include in their articles.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * I would say so far the content has been good with the amount of information given about the artist.
 * The work is concise about the artist themselves, the type of work they do, the artwork, and labeling their accomplishments either including books or awards.
 * The content could be improvised if you add information about the intention the artist has made this work

General info
User: ChenooEE
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:ChenooEE/Tom Jones (artist)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * User:ChenooEE/Tom Jones (artist)