User:Cherryblossom1072/Cross-cultural communication/Marzipan Calicoco Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Cherryblossom1072


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Cross-cultural communication
 * Sandbox: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cherryblossom1072/Cross-cultural_communication?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cross-cultural communication

Evaluate the drafted changes
Note: I am basing this peer review off changes Cherryblossom1072 has made to the article.

Lead
The lead has not been updated, but the information my peer has added is relevant to the lead as written. The lead is already concise and clear. I don't believe further changes are necessary.

Content / Tone / Sources / Organization
Cherryblossom1072 added to the "Cross-cultural Communication in the Workplace" section. The first addition to this section brings up an important aspect of cross-cultural communication, which is that it can be nonverbal or spoken, and then goes on to assert there will be "drastic hardships" for organizations or companies that have restricted communications. The article cited is an excellent source and dives into different linguistic terms countries have developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It may be of value to include more from this article that's specifically related to cross-cultural communication in the workplace post-pandemic, like the difference between the US "stay-at-home order" and Malaysia's "movement control order." This could warrant a new sub-section, or be included in the current section depending on length and detail of the expansion. The tone matches the rest of the article well.

The second addition isn't clear. The sentence reads, "Even with the translation methods that technology provides, language barriers remain to fall fast." I'm confused about the meaning and would advise this be rephrased for clarity. I'm also confused by the selected placement as this sentence is interjected in a paragraph about a specific study to do with the RESTORE program. The source as well as the content don't directly relate to the material of the study and I suggest reorganizing the addition of this information.

Overall
Cherryblossom1072 has done a great job finding reliable sources and adding citations where previously there were none. This is a good start on updating this article. Further updates could expand on views outside the US, as well as inclusion of cross-cultural communications in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic.