User:Chevyjm/Diversity arrays technology/Nistoner Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Chevyjm


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Diversity arrays technology


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Diversity arrays technology

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The first sentence gives a good overview of the topic. My main feedback for the lead would be to consider making the lead more concise and moving the information to other sections. For example, you discuss the discovery of DArT in the lead, but then you also discuss it later in the article.

Content: You added a lot of current, relevant content to the article and really helped flesh the topic out.

Tone: The tone of the article was good and remained very neutral.

Sources: Many of the sources used are from the early 2000's, so consider adding some more recent sources. Overall though the sources used seem reliable and they are used well to back up facts in the article.

Organization: The article is broken up into sections well. The sections are clear and help make the information easier to understand.

One area of work for the organization of the article is fixing some grammatical errors. There are various spots in the article where an incorrect tense is used, or the tense is not consistent.

Image: The image used in the article is awesome! However, I feel like it could be placed in a better location such as below the lead.

Overall: Great job!