User:Chh38430/Acinetobacter baylyi/MargaretTulliver Peer Review

General info
(Chh38430, Pesce131, Bmore77)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Chh38430/Acinetobacter baylyi
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Acinetobacter baylyi

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:


 * this is a great start; a good outline has been written here

Content:


 * relevant to topic

Tone and Balance:


 * definitely a neutral tone
 * some subjects are not fully represented, but I think this is just because this is a draft; I see a section on the cell cycle which would be helful even though content hasn't been added

Sources and References:


 * all the references seem to be peer-reviewed, objective, and scientific papers
 * I don't see any problematic sources
 * all the sources are written within the last 20 years

Organization:


 * the organization completed here is a great start to getting more information about this microbe on the page
 * the original article has no organization to speak of, so this sandbox page is really helpful with each of these sections

Images and Media:


 * the sandbox draft did not include any images yet

Overall Impressions:


 * the added content definitely has improved the very limited range of the original article, completing it more fully by adding specific sections on history, metabolism, culture growth, and genetic mechanism (which were not present before)