User:Chicagooo/Hot pot/Jiguguji Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Evaluating on the checklist:

Everything in the article is relevent to the article topic, nothing distracted me. The tone is neutral. There are no viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. There is no missing citation and sources' link in the sandbox, Existing Sources are neutral