User:Chicanxm175wikiproject/Ruby Chacon/Jtor0278 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Chicanxm175wikiproject)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Chicanxm175wikiproject/Ruby Chacon


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead guiding questions


 * The lead produces a coherent way of describing what will be seen throughout the wiki page without directly saying "I will be talking about ___, ____, and ____. This was a very good lead which concisely included all the information that was needed.

Content guiding questions


 * This article does deal with a subject that experiences equity gaps. However, the sources used are from the same underrepresented people that are being represented in this article.
 * The content is relevant to the topic, my only concern is in the "Early/Personal Life" section that describes Ruby Chacon's son and how they got in an accident but the artist continued her pursuit of artivism. I am not sure what the connection here is about being in a car accident and losing their passion for artivism.

Tone and Balance guiding questions


 * The content seemed neutral. There were no points that were either overrepresented or underrepresented.

Sources and references guiding questions


 * There are a lot of references and many of them are from reputable and reliable places. Many of them seem to have been found on reputable databases which back up the information that is included on this article.

Organization guiding questions


 * The content is organized in a coherent way.
 * In terms of grammatical errors, I have not seen any but there is a point that had two spaces instead of one, which isn't so bad but if that can just be fixed (:

Images and Media guiding questions


 * There are no images in this article. This may have to do with the writer not being able to get permission to do so which is fine.

For New articles only


 * This article does follow the Notability requirements. It even has more than 2-3 notable sources and more than enough other references that exhaust the subject furthermore!
 * This article does not link to anymore articles.

Overall feedback


 * This article was well made. There are so many references that make the article very trustworthy. It is easy to follow along with and I was able to really understand what the artist stands for.