User:Chickadee101/Mediatization (media)/Dimsumyo Peer Review

General info
chickadee101
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Chickadee101/Mediatization (media)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Mediatization (media)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Mediatization Peer Review-

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic. Sexual Script Theory is a new topic for me, so I feel I learned a lot. I wasn't distracted by anything.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

I feel that this article is very neutral. I don't detect any claims or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

I don't detect viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Everything is neutral.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

Since the citations haven't been linked yet, I can only say that the citations listed are good and detailed.

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

All sources are neutral and come from reliable references.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

All information is up to date. The lead and citations just need to be added. Otherwise, the article is really informative.