User:ChickenNugg2343/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Criminology)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.(I chose this article because Criminology interest me and it matters because it helps society understand control and reduce crime, I knew that it was important but I didn't fully understand why)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.) What distracted me was the different sizes of font for different titles and it looks like an error when they were writing it. When clicking on two words in red it was sent to an error link to another article. The most recent year with this data is from 2000 everything else is really old from 1900s. Something that could be added is more recent information. Some areas could have more information as they seem more important than some areas of the article. I honestly the article had a good job discussing the equity gaps and made sure to include other cultural backgrounds and beliefs. The only thing I think needs to be improved is a little more information on some key points and making sure the title size font is the same for key points, as it was distracting and misleading to other information. The article doesn't seem biased at all as they provided many perspectives and known facts. There was one section regarding Marxist that seem overrepresented. Yes the citation work and the source does support the article claims.