User:Chiderahanaebue/Club for Growth/Tuk28507 Peer Review

Lead
a. Good and Clear Introductory Sentence

b. No description of Articles major sections

c. Doesn't seem overly detailed or bulky, I think there could actually be more information (which my classmate has pointed out!)

Content
a. Relevant content added

Tone & Balance
a. neutral tone

b. Editor is actually better representing beliefs of the organization that had previously gone unmentioned for more Libertarian beliefs.

Sources and References
You cannot use an Organizations own website for a source!

Organization
a. Ideas are well organized and thought out

Article HAS been improved based on this review.

Overall Feedback: It is important, especially for political science students, to know these sorts of distinctions between ideas (libertarian and conservative fiscal ideas), so I am glad you thought to add some of this information clarifying this. Love they way you're thinking about the small pieces of this article!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)