User:Chikiaart/Black feminism/Pelton98 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing

Chikiaart


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Chikiaart/Black feminism


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Black feminism

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: I feel that the lead in the current wiki article is very well constructed, and I feel as though not much from this section requires much editing or adding. bell hooks is referenced within the lead of the article as a leading black feminist academic but is not mentioned within the Black feminist literature section of the page.

Content Planning on being added: I am feeling slightly confused about where you are going in terms of the information you are adding. It seems like the references you are making to Beyonce could be construed as being biased since in your sandbox you reference different opinions from both bell hooks, and Janet Mock. I don't think it would be following the wikipedia format to add these opinions into the article. Although bell hooks's view is very important and valuable especially in terms of a black feminist theorist and thinker, but in this case, you should be drawing more from news articles or texts rather than what she thinks about someone (Beyonce) as a black woman in the music industry.

If you would like to develop Beyonce's section within the Wikipedia article you could as there is currently minimal information within the page on her, so you could potentially add to it drawing from current and reliable sources.

If you would like to add to some information to the currently article on bell hooks as well, I do not believe I see her listed within the section entitled Black feminist literature. I feel that it would be very important to include her in this section, and think that would be something very worthwhile for you to develop into this page to include her more.

Sources: I cannot not see any sources currently cited within your sandbox so I am not sure wether or not they are reliable/unbiased. Although the sources that I checked within the current article all seem legitimate and properly reflect the articles information.