User:Chinnerj/Tactical emergency medical services/Medstudent2021 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

chinnerj


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Chinnerj/sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tactical emergency medical services

Evaluate the drafted changes
This article is coming along nicely! I thought the lead was well written. This is mostly a stylistic critique, but it seems more relevant to have the history section come later since the history of the field, while a valuable part of the article, doesn't seem to be the "main" topic. I would probably place it near the "future" section. The list under the section "Injuries treated in the field" feels a bit awkward to me, I would probably choose to just include that in sentence form at another place in the article. The pictures from different nationalities does a good job at reinforcing that isn't a "USA" topic, but an international one.

The tone I thought was neutral, and I didn't feel like I was reading any biased material. There did seem to be a heavier citation of 1 article, but I don't know what other sources are out there. If there are some you have at hand, it could possibly strengthen some points by adding an additional source. The physician perspective might be more thoroughly represented here than other roles on the Tactical EMS squad. I like your implementation of wiki links throughout the article.

Overall, I think this article is a great addition to wikipedia and work to be proud of. It looks like a great improvement over the live page!