User:Chipmonkey9/European eel/Axlra Peer Review

General info
Chipmonkey9
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Chipmonkey9/European eel
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):European eel

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead is concise and reflects the content that you have added to the article, however it would help to add short mentions of the major topics outlined in each section you have added. The mention of the eel which lived 155 years would fit better in a section regarding the health/ biological traits/ lifespan of the eel.

Your first body paragraph would benefit from a more neutral tone, so try not to use informal phrases and words. Also, including the technique of linking Wikipedia articles about topics when they are mentioned would help space out the paragraph as well. This can be done by highlighting the word/phrase, and clicking on the 'link' icon, to the right of the text bold/italic/underline button, and searching up the article that corresponds with the reference. You need to add commas to some of your sentences too.

Spacing out some topics also would help the article, as the paragraphs are large and bulky. Please also consider adding another heading in between the first and second paragraphs, as it seems to focus on disease/parasites more than fishery usage.Overall, good work on the article, it adds more information that was not previously covered, it just needs some more formatting to fill it out.