User:Chiqueno/CCAP Rhode Island/Adam conlon Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Chiqueno
 * User:Chiqueno/CCAP Rhode Island

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes but the intro sentence could be less wordy.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? It offers a table of contents which is helpful.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead offers a summary of the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise without being too wordy.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? I am not familiar with the topic but it appears to me to be thorough.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The article is informative, describing what exactly CCAP is/does, therefore no stance is taken on it.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No it just describes CCAP

Sources and References

 * All the sources are correct and they all work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the rhetoric is clear and easy to digest.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not that I saw.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes it is organized well in the various sections

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * n/a

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? All the sources are related to the literature on the subject.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? All the information is sourced clearly.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes it links to other articles such as Child Care Development Block Grant and Temporary Assistance.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * The only section that I think could have used some more information was the "expansion" section. I was interested to know more about this program in rural parts of the state compared to urban, as it briefly is mentioned in that section.

==== Overall evaluation- '''My overall evaluation is that the article was thorough with sources backing up the literature. As someone who had no knowledge of CCAP Rhode Island, it was an informative and interesting read on this child care program, and how it helps families in Rhode Island.''' ====