User:Chloeolivia30/Nutritional genomics/Shaleeg Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Chloeolivia30
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Nutritional genomics (introduction)

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? The content added is relevant because it gives a good definition, while also introducing other elements that are related to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? yes
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

'''The content that was added did improve the overall quality of the article because it gave the article an introduction, which gave an overview of some of the specific aspects of the overall topic. If there was more information added or more sources it could improve, but what was added was completely new, so it gave it a good start'''.