User:Chongkeke/sandbox

Contributive Sentences:


 * Foam glass, lightweight, opaque glass material having a closed-cell structure. It is made in molds that are packed with crushed or granulated glass mixed with a chemical agent such as carbon or limestone. At the temperature at which the glass grains become soft enough to cohere, the agent gives off a gas that is entrapped in the glass and forms the closed-cell structure that remains after cooling. Foam glass is light enough to float in water and has been used as a substitute for cork, but its main uses are for thermal and sound insulation. It is impervious to moisture, most fumes, and vermin.
 * "Using quartzofeldspathic waste to obtain foamed glass material" https://ac.els-cdn.com/S2405653716300240/1-s2.0-S2405653716300240-main.pdf?_tid=3e6fd5a0-816c-406e-a4b0-febb30ba5846&acdnat=1542302844_2db607913c5ad6af624de63ed3140c1f
 * "Novel inorganic gel casting process for the manufacturing of glass foams" https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0955221917300262 token=1209D90AC816560DE61DA6AAD33C17D930A30E80C3889E41BCB0162C6B2F7D9757FC02004751B9CD9BF8B15CFA2C086F

Article evaluationIndustrial Arts


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?     The description of the definition of Industrial arts is basically accurate and relevant, but  in the following content, the author excessively focuses on the introduction and description of Industrial Arts in New South Wales, which is a little narrow.
 * Is anything missing that could be added?    I think it is better to add some developmental history, current status and future trends of industrial art around the world, not just to New South Wales.Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?     Neutral enough. Industrial Arts is not a controversial term, and the author focuses on the description of the definition and basic information.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?     There is only one citation in reference. Although the link work, the link is not closely relevant to Industrial Arts. The reference and external links are not supportive enough.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?    Because the reference is not enough, I don't think the facts is reliable.
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?   only one comment:   Plc007 (talk) 02:46, 9 August 2008 (UTC)         Good job, now there's no relevance toward America, the country that built wikipedia and is its biggest consumer. You ruined this article24.136.136.42 (talk) 01:04, 16 October 2012 (UTC).