User:Chriisty/Evaluate an Article

Bryson Tiller
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Bryson Tiller
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate: I enjoy this artist's music and I also want to learn more personal things about him.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it quickly states who the person being talked about is known for.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, the lead begins by talking about his early life, which is the first section and so on.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, the lead and the article includes some of the same information, like for instance where Bryson Tiller was born.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead is concise it isn't overly detailed

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, the article's content insists of Bryson Tiller's life of his career as a singer.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Not really because he has other newer albums that came out and it was not talked about.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? His newer albums and singles are missing, I think it just has to be updated.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? Yes it is neutral, it just states facts there are no opinions or anything
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, all of the information given is all factual and not biased
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Tiller's Discography is underrepresented because they only have two albums listed
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, again the information provided is all just factions and does not include any persuasion.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes there were a lot of sources links in the text to support what they were stating and also all at the end.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, the sources have to do with what is being said.
 * Are the sources current? The sources aren't too current but they are not super old.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, the links I clicked on worked.

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, the article gets straight to the point with not too much details.
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No there are no spelling or grammatical errors.
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The article is well organized and it is broken down into sections but the major points of the topic is not listed in the leading paragraph.

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Yes I think it includes a right amount of photos
 * Are images well-captioned? Not all of them, only half are well captioned
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Yes all of the images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? The images are laid out in a visually appealing way.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There isn't a lot of talk going on under the "Talk" tab
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This is a C-class article
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? There is not a lot of talk happening under the Talk tab

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status? It is brief but gets straight to the point with the facts about Bryson Tiller
 * What are the article's strengths? That they don't add too much details
 * How can the article be improved? They can have a more detailed caption about the picture provided and they should update it because all they talk about is his old albums which only consists of two.
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? I think it is underdeveloped, so far it is a good start but it could be better with some improving.

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: